My mother drilled the basics of English grammar into me and my sister growing up. And I was really lucky to have a fantastic English lit professor in
College. I'm also one who thinks that journalism, at it's best, needs to be about delivering a public service as much as it is about "ratings."
And so I must say that I am quite disappointed to see very reputable outfits like Business Week resort to lowly hyperbole when discussing the current economic slowdown. Take this headline from today's Businessweek.com for instance: "
London's Commercial Real Estate Freeze."
Freeze - that's a pretty serious word. It means locked up, not moving, not available, shut down, etc. Some markets today are frozen, and so it's well within the realm of possibility that London's commercial real estate market could also be. But it's not, not according to the article anyway. No, the article offers a different, more nuanced, story that's less, shall we say, sensationalist: "...with funding increasingly hard to come by and fears that demand for office space will continue to drop, many ... projects have now been delayed or shelved." Many projects delayed, meaning some have not been delayed, which is hardly consistent with the notion of something being "frozen," and some shelved.
I titled this entry "loose lips" because, as the famous saying goes, they sink ships. We are all in the same boat, and the media, especially leading outlets like Business Week, have a responsibility to not add unnecessarily to people's fears. Wouldn't a more responsible title be something like "London's Commercial Real Estate Hit by Economic Downturn"?